Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Fw: Coyotes,Wolves,Cougars..forever!


  From: "Wolves, Wolf Facts, Cougars, Cougar Facts, Coyotes, Coyote Facts - Wolves, Cougars, Coyotes Forever" <rick.meril@gmail.com>

  Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 9:43 AM
Subject: Coyotes,Wolves,Cougars..forever!

Coyotes,Wolves,Cougars..forever!

Posted: 29 Jul 2012 10:27 PM PDT

Citizen scientists sought to monitor red foxes

dailydemocrat.com
A UC Davis alumna is seeking citizen scientists to help in reporting sightings of red foxes.
A UC Davis alumna is studying citizen science to help understand the habitat needs and current population of the Sacramento Valley red fox. Used as her masters project, her findings are expected to help improve citizen science methods for future studies. This next phase, which will focus on better understanding the habitat needs and current abundance of the Sacramento Valley red fox, represents a continuation in the collaborative effort among UC Davis, the California Department of Fish and Game, and the US Fish and Wildlife Service. People interested in participating in the study should go to the website: http://foxsurvey.ucdavis.edu/ to participate in the survey. Amy Brasch, who is with Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand, is looking for information on the foxes, which were long thought to be non-native. However, in 2005 genetic analyses performed in the UCD School of Veterinary Medicine's, Veterinary Genetics Laboratory revealed these foxes to be native to the region and potentially in decline. "These discoveries set off a joint effort by UC Davis and the California Department of Fish and Game to characterize the fox's range extent, and potential interbreeding with non-native red fox populations to the south," according to Brasch. Led by Dr. Ben Sacks, assistant adjunct professor in the SVM and director of the Canid Diversity and Conservation Unit of the VGL, this project relied on citizen science, the centerpiece of which was an online reporting system for the public to communicate red fox sightings. During 2007-2009, over 400 reports were submitted by the public, which were instrumental in locating a total of 51 fox dens mapped throughout the Sacramento Valley and, ultimately, in advancing their conservation priority, currently under consideration as a California Mammal Species of Special Concern. Now, the citizen science that was central to the 2007-2009 red fox study is itself the topic of a masters project being conducted by Brasch in collaboration with her adviser, Dr. Heiko Wittmer, a senior lecturer at Victoria University of Wellington in New Zealand with an adjunct affiliation in the Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology at UCD, and Dr. Sacks. Their project seeks to better understand factors affecting public participation to more effectively utilize citizen science in future research and to seek ways to increase the educational value of participation for members of the public. To accomplish this, Ms. Brasch designed a web-based survey that she is asking the public to visit. It is linked to the original survey website, http://www.foxsurvey.ucdavis.edu/ and can be completed in 5 minutes. The findings of this study will be used immediately to enhance the reporting web site, which will be re-launched for phase II of the Sacramento Valley red fox study, slated to begin January 2013 and extend over through 2016 
Posted: 29 Jul 2012 10:18 PM PDT
Endangered Cottontail Rabbits Getting Help
downeast.com
sea_glass_chefs_garden_table_002.jpg
New England Cottontails are getting some much needed help, hopefully before they completely vanish like Alice in Wonderland’s white rabbit that hopped into a hole, never to be seen again.

The cottontail, once prolific from southeastern New York to southern Maine, has lost 86 percent of its habitat since the 1960s, according to the Wildlife Management Institute. Regaining rabbit habitat won’t be easy or inexpensive. The cottontail is on state Endangered Species Lists in Maine and New Hampshire and is a candidate for the federal Endangered Species List.

State wildlife agencies from Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and New York, along with the US Fish and Wildlife Service and Natural Resources Conservation Service, plus the Wildlife Management Institute and National Fish and Wildlife Foundation are parties in a regional conservation strategy to save the cottontail.

Millions of dollars from The Natural Resources Conservation Service and The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation are committed to the strategy’s 82 actions including goals for the number of acres of rabbit habitat to be managed in each state.

Creating and enhancing habitat where cottontails already exist appears to be critical. Last year Maine’s Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife moved 15 cottontail rabbits from the Portland jetport – where they were in the way of an airport expansion – to a Kennebunkport island. All of the rabbits died after being moved.

“Our hope was we could move them to this Shangri-la island away from the jets and breed them and move on,” said a disappointed Wally Jacubus, DIF&W’s mammal group leader.

I recently visited one of the more exciting and extensive habitat projects at Cape Elizabeth’s Inn by the Sea, a collaboration between the Inn and Maine’s Bureau of Parks and Lands which owns the adjacent Crescent Beach State Park.

BPL wildlife biologist Joe Wiley reported recently on the project, noting that, “Ten foot wide strips approximately 1300 feet long were mowed at the edge of old field habitats at Crescent Beach. The strips are immediately adjacent to the dense shrub-scrub habitat that the cottontails prefer.

They seldom venture more than 16 feet from escape cover. Periodic mowing of the strips throughout the growing season provides succulent regrowth of the rabbit’s preferred natural foods close to dense cover.

“The Cape Elizabeth state park complex and adjacent private lands support the most state endangered New England cottontails in Maine,” said Wiley.
The Inn by the Sea – an elegant resort that borders Crescent Beach – has removed two acres of invasive, nonindigenous plant species, such as bamboo and bitter street, from state park land. It’s a tough job, requiring repeated plowing up of the ground.

“Now, we’re hand pulling the bamboo as it keeps coming up,” the Inn’s Rauni Kew told me during my visit there. Local shrubs such as raspberry, blueberry, dogwood, alder, winterberry, and dewberry have been planted.

Rauni summed up the problem nicely, noting that the cottontail, “is not a great species. They’re small and don’t turn white in the winter,” leaving them vulnerable to predation, especially from coyotes that are now common in Cape Elizabeth. “They need our help,” she said.

The good news is that biologists who collected rabbit scat identified 89 different cottontails in and around that area. And now, what Rauni calls her “rabitat” gives the bunnies a wonderful place to live – as elegant for them as the Inn by the Sea is for us!

You are subscribed to email updates from Wolves, Wolf Facts, Cougars, Cougar Facts, Coyotes, Coyote Facts - Wolves, Cougars, Coyotes Forever
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.
Email delivery powered by Google
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610

Fw: Carson City Council Forms Task Force On Coyote Protection « CBS Los Angeles

THE COYOTE FIGHT CONTINUE'SIN THE CITY OF CARSON.
 From: "randalmassaro@gmail.com"

Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Fw: Fwd: FW: City of Carson -CC Special Meeting - Wednesday, July 25, 2012

7-25-12 CC Special (Coyotes).pdf Download this file

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Randal Massaro <randal_massaro@yahoo.com>
To: MICHAELBROWNLEY <NEWS@FOX11.COM>; SIERRA SUN NEWSPAPER <EDITOR@SIERRASUN.COM>; "NEWS @UNIVISION.NET" <NEWS@UNIVISION.NET>; "NEWS@KROG.NET" <NEWS@KROG.NET>; "NEWSROOM@KFWB.COM" <NEWSROOM@KFWB.COM>; MICHAELBROWNLEY <NEWS@FOX11.COM>; ASSOCIATED PRESS <SACRAMENTO@AP.ORG>; ASSNEDITOR <ktlastoryideas@tribune.com>; ASSOCIATED PRESS <LOSANGELES@AP.ORG>
Cc: RANDAL MASSARO <RANDAL_MASSARO@YAHOO.COM>
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 7:06 AM
Subject: Fw: Fwd: FW: City of Carson -CC Special Meeting - Wednesday, July 25, 2012




From: Randal Massaro <randalmassaro@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 6:01 AM
Subject: Fwd: FW: City of Carson -SPECIAL EMERGENCY COUNCIL MEETING CALLED FOR - Wednesday, July 25, 2012
AT 11:30AM  DUE TO COYOTE PROBLEM. ( NATIVE AMERICAN'S JOIN IN THE FIGHT )

PRESS RELEASE FOR JULY 25 TH, WED.2012
CITY OF CARSON CALL'S FOR SURPRISE SPECIAL EMERGENCY COUNCIL MEETING FOR JULY 25TH WED,2012 AT 11:30 AM AT CARSON CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER'S.
TO ADDRESS COYOTE ISSUE.
NATIVE AMERICAN'S JOIN IN THE FIGHT TO SAVE THE COYOTE'S.
NATIVE AMERICAN GROUP'S VOW TO STOP TRAPPING AND KILLING OF COYOTE'S IN CITY OF CARSON,AS COYOTE'S HAVE BEEN A PART OF NATIVE AMERICAN FOLKLORE, STORYTELLING AND ON SACRED AND RELIGIOUS BELIEF'S.
MANY ANIMAL'S ARE HELD IN HIGH REGARD IN NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURE,JUST AS AMERICAN'S HOLD THE BIBLE SACRED, OR MUSLIMS HOLD THE KORAN, OR MORMON'S HAVE THE BOOK OF MORMON, OR LIKE THE AMERICAN FLAG OR STATE FLAG.
NATIVE AMERICAN'S MAY SEND THEIR OWN REPRESENTATIVE'S TODAY TO THE CARSON CITY COUNCIL MEETING.
FROM : NAARM-NATIVE AMERICAN ANIMAL RIGHT'S MOVEMENT,
NATIVE AMERICAN'S FOR SOCIAL  JUSTICE,
NATIVES HELPING NATIVES,
1ST NATIONS-4 DIRECTIONS,
AIM-AMERICAN INDIAN MOVEMENT,
UNITED STATE'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR UNION MEMBER'S FOR THE PRESERVATION OF WILDLIFE ( AN UNDERGROUND WILDLIFE GROUP) WAS REQUESTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF SOME NATIVE AMERICAN GROUP'S.
RANDAL MASSARO
1-760-245-3635

Subject: FW: City of Carson -CC Special Meeting - Wednesday, July 25, 2012
To: "Randal_Massaro@yahoo.com" <Randal_Massaro@yahoo.com>, "RandalMassaro@gmail.com" <RandalMassaro@gma
 



Fw: Los Angeles: Celebrate Elephant Awareness Day!

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: PETA <do-not-reply@peta.org>
To: randal_massaro@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 6:00 AM
Subject: Los Angeles: Celebrate Elephant Awareness Day!
PETA's Action Team Alert
Get ActiveLivingTVShopDonate NowShare on Facebook
Dear Randal,

Please join PETA, Animal Defenders International and Juliette West, the star of How I Became an Elephant, in celebrating the first annual Elephant Awareness Day on August 3! Elephant Awareness Day was established in Juliette's honor, and we are gathering before the next Los Angeles City Council meeting in Van Nuys to urge the council to support Councilmember Paul Koretz's efforts to protect elephants and other wild animals who are used in circuses and other traveling acts.

We'll start the celebration one hour before the meeting (please wear red), and you're encouraged to go to the meeting afterward and speak briefly during the public comment period to let the council know that you support a ban on the use of elephants and other wild animals in circuses (even if you would rather not speak, your support attending the meeting and wearing red is appreciated):

When: Friday, August 3, 9-10 a.m.
Where: Van Nuys City Hall, 14410 Sylvan St., Van Nuys, CA 91401 (Please meet on the public sidewalk on Sylvan Street in front of City Hall; see this map).
Contact: Eric at EricD@peta.org or 323-351-0188


All posters and leaflets will be provided, and please note that reserved parking will not be available.

If this is your first time attending an outreach event—or even if you're a pro—please read our handy tips. We welcome everyone to come out as these events are a fun and upbeat way to help animals.

For all animals,


 
 Eric Deardorff
 Action Team Assistant Manager
 People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
 EricD@peta.org
 Add PETA on Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter.


Click to update your e-mail preferences or to unsubscribe.

Please do not respond to this e-mail. Instead, click here to contact PETA.

This e-mail was sent by PETA, 501 Front St., Norfolk, VA 23510 USA.
 

Fw: Coyotes,Wolves,Cougars..forever!

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "Wolves, Wolf Facts, Cougars, Cougar Facts, Coyotes, Coyote Facts - Wolves, Cougars, Coyotes Forever" <rick.meril@gmail.com>
To: RANDAL_MASSARO@YAHOO.COM
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 9:41 AM
Subject: Coyotes,Wolves,Cougars..forever!

Coyotes,Wolves,Cougars..forever!

Carter Niemeyer sent me this article highlighting the concerned, credible and conscientious words that flowed from Bruce Babbitt this past Wednesday, June 8 regarding attempts by Congress to dismantle the key Environmental Legislation of the past 50 years..................Mr. Babbitt was Interior Secretary during the Clinton years and was the most energetic and productive Secretary we have had in the Interior Post for the past 50 years.................Babbitt issues a call to arms to fight the shortsighted and narrow minded Congress ...........He specifically pleads with President Obama to take a stand and lead, rather than standing on the sidelines......or letting others set the agenda..............I applaud and agree 100% with Bruce Babbit..........The President has the bully pulpit, he has the legislative tools and he has the moral high ground..........All he needs to do is STAND UP AND BE COUNTED!
Posted: 12 Jun 2011 08:45 PM PDT

Congress has declared war on the environment

By Bruce Babbitt  
Former Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt delivered the following speech at the National Press Club on Wednesday, June 8, 2011.It is now more than ten years since I left public office. I am returning to the public stage today because I believe that this Congress, in its assaults on our environment, has embarked on the most radical course in our history. Congress, led by the House of Representatives, has declared war on our land, water and natural resources. And it is time for those of us who support our conservation tradition to raise our voices on behalf of the American people.  It is clear to me that the House of Representatives will not only block progress, but will continue to sustain an assault on our public lands and water. Therefore, it is imperative that President Obama take up the mantle of land and water conservation – something that he has not yet done in a significant way. President Obama and the Executive Branch are the best, and likely only, hope for meaningful progress on this critical issue. So I am here today to call on the president to lead us in standing up to the radical agenda of the House of Representatives, and to replace their draconian agenda with a bold conservation vision. The opening salvos in this war were fired in April, when the new Congress enacted a budget measure, called a Continuing Resolution, to appropriate funding for the balance of this fiscal year. Beneath the cover of that budget process, however, the House leadership inserted unrelated "riders" to begin dismantling our environmental laws. Here are three examples of these "riders." .........................
  
•    In the April resolution, Congress removed the grey wolf from the Endangered Species list. The restoration of the grey wolf to Yellowstone and our northern forests was an historic achievement, now threatened by this Congress.

•    In the April budget resolution, Congress terminated an administration program to rebuild our depleted ocean fisheries. The program, called "catch shares" was amazingly successful in restoring fish populations and providing fishing jobs and was on the way to becoming the most innovative environmental initiative of the Obama Administration.

•    In the April budget resolution, Congress axed an initiative by the Secretary of the Interior to identify and maintain the natural character of our most important remaining undesignated public lands. Viewed singly, in isolation from one another, these rider provisions might not appear to justify my characterization of this Congress as the most radical in history. Yet viewing them together, along with pending legislative proposals, a larger outline emerges. It is a pattern of a broad, sustained assault on nearly all our environmental laws.

          The intent is to chip away, a blow at a time, at the edifice of environmental laws and regulations, avoiding a frontal assault that would call attention to the overall objective.  To illustrate, I would like today to single out for discussion, just one such area, and that is the public land laws that are so meaningful to me as a westerner and that are so much a part of our great American heritage. The best place to observe what is happening is by reference with our two great public laws, the Antiquities Act of 1906 and the Wilderness Act of 1964. The Antiquities Act is a great American innovation. It was enacted into law in 1906 on June 8th, the very date on which I am making these remarks. It was sponsored by a Republican Congressman and signed by a Republican President, Theodore Roosevelt. Way then, more than a hundred years ago, the sponsor, Rep. John Lacey (R-Iowa), made this observation: "The immensity of man's power to destroy imposes a responsibility to preserve." Since then the Act has been used by nearly every president, laying the foundation for many of our best known National Parks and other protected areas. President Clinton used the Antiquities Act to establish the Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument, a widely acclaimed decision.  President George W. Bush used the Act to protect the marine reefs and waters of the Northwest Hawaiian Islands, the largest area ever set aside under the Act. The radical leaders of the House voiced few objections to that action by their President, perhaps because oil and gas companies have evinced little interest in the Islands. This past April, a House rider to gut the Antiquities Act failed by a mere four votes. Now that the public has been awakened, I doubt that Congressional leaders will try another frontal attack. However, what they are continuing to do is to chip away with piecemeal bills and amendments some of which will likely be transmuted into budget riders during the course of the summer in budget negotiation:.-Here are a few examples. Rep. Denny Rehberg (R-Mont.) has introduced legislation to exempt Montana from the Antiquities Act and Rep. Raul Labrador (R-Idaho) to exempt Idaho. Similar legislation was introduced in the Senate to exempt Nevada.

-Perhaps the ultimate objective of these piecemeal attacks is best revealed by a bill introduced by Rep. Rob Bishop (R-Utah) and others that would amend the United States Constitution to grant states the power to nullify Federal law.

-The Wilderness Act of 1964 is the other great, generic public land law of our Nation. The National Wilderness Preservation System, with units established by Congress in virtually every state in the Union, is an enduring achievement of many successive Congresses.  The radical leaders of the House, however, are relentlessly attempting to chip away at this law as well. Not only are certain members of Congress prohibiting any new Wilderness designations, a bill recently introduced in both houses by Senator John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) and Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) would eliminate our nation's Wilderness Study Areas - millions of acres no longer protected for conservation. In addition it would remove protections for National Forest Roadless Areas - watersheds that provide our drinking water, and protect the best fish and game habitat in the West.  In total, this extreme bill would undo protections for more than 40 million acres of public land.                                                     As these attacks escalate the urgent question for those of us who support and advocate for our conservation tradition is how to respond.  One alternative is to lie low, hoping that this storm will soon pass by without too much lasting damage.  Failure to respond, however, is a form of appeasement that has not worked in the past and it will not work this time. Our adversaries prefer to operate in the shadows, outside the sunshine generated by public knowledge and participation. For our opponents know that when anti-environmentalism becomes a public issue they will lose. They know that American support for our environmental heritage is wide and deep. We made the appeasement mistake when I was Secretary. Back in 1995, another Congress, in thrall to then House Speaker Gingrich, inserted a "salvage rider" to increase logging in our National Forests onto an appropriations bill. Pressured by the timber industry and the House leadership, we capitulated and President Clinton signed the bill with the rider intact. It was a big mistake that set off a prolonged and destructive episode in the history of our National Forests.  We did learn from that experience however. President Clinton vowed to veto any additional anti-environmental riders. The Congress, aware that when the president commands the high ground, he will carry public opinion, backed off. We did not face another rider crisis.                                                   I'm not here, however, to dwell on the past. I am here to look forward. To sound the alarm about the assault on our natural resources by the Republicans in Congress, and also to remind the president that he has the power, the responsibility and the public support to stand up to those who would destroy our natural and cultural heritage. The current debt limit and budget negotiations will provide President Obama an opportunity to demonstrate that he has learned from the events of April. He should stand strong against environmental riders, in whatever guise, whether legislative amendments, funding moratoria, or limitations on agency initiatives. Drawing a line against riders is a good beginning. However, we cannot measure conservation progress by the number of bad ideas that are blocked. We should measure progress in healthy rivers and streams, forests protected, species saved and restored, wilderness areas added and national monuments created.               The Antiquities Act is a good place for this Administration to begin building a conservation legacy. The Antiquities Act is a remarkable conservation tool that has been used to protect renowned areas including Grand Canyon, Zion, Olympic National Park and Joshua Tree National Park.  The act has also played a critical role in protecting our nation's cultural resources and safeguarding dozens of archeological sites. It was used extensively by President Obama's immediate predecessors. President Clinton used the Act to establish the Grand Staircase and more than twenty other Monuments. President George W. Bush set aside a larger area than any of his predecessors – the marine reefs and waters of the Northwest Hawaiian Islands.  The Antiquities Act has, for more than a hundred years, granted the President authority to establish National Monuments. Monuments should be established through a process of public consultation both local and national, with a chance for all to be heard. But that process cannot begin until the Administration puts forth specific proposals for public consideration There are numerous proposals, and many important cultural, historical and environmental sites are awaiting protection. Many of these proposals have wide public support, including the endorsement of members of Congress from the areas in question. The best way to defend the Antiquities Act is for the president to use it.   
   
The Wilderness Act is also in need of more vigorous advocacy from its friends, including the Administration.The critics who complain that we already have too much Wilderness have it all wrong. We have too little designated Wilderness. Here are some facts; the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) administers more than 250 million acres of public land. More than 41 million acres of that land is leased for oil and gas. To date only 9 million acres of public land managed by the BLM has been designated as Wilderness. It is past time to bring some balance back to the public lands with the creation of more Wilderness Areas. The designation of Wilderness is a Congressional prerogative. And every member of Congress, from whatever part of the country, has an equal voice and vote in designating Wilderness. For the public lands, wherever located, are the common patrimony of this nation, belonging to each and every citizen of this country.  President Obama should call upon the Congress to expand the National Wilderness Preservation System. A good place to begin is with the wilderness bills already introduced, most of them by members of Congress from the states where the lands are located.  And the president should remind the Congress that where wilderness legislation is being bottled up by an intransigent few, that he has the power to designate those areas as National Monuments, a designation which can carry protection comparable to a Wilderness designation.By voicing his willingness to use the Antiquities Act as an alternative to Wilderness designation, the president can bring Congress to the table to work out conservation measures acceptable to reasonable stakeholders. President Clinton used the Antiquities Act in this fashion to work with the Congress, and it produced good results in such places as Steens Mountain in Oregon, the Colorado Canyons, the San Jacinto Mountains and Otay Mountain in California and Las Cienegas in Arizona, among others. We also need to hear this administration in support of protection for our ocean resources. For too long the beauty and diversity and productivity of ocean life and fisheries has been taken for granted, as limitless and beyond destruction. That is no longer the case. Every day we are learning more of the impending destruction of coral reef systems and declining productivity of our oceans. This administration has frequently spoken of the need for responsible expansion of offshore oil exploration and production.  Well and good, but we have not heard equally strong support for enhanced conservation and protection of the most important places in our offshore waters and along our coastlines. The link between offshore oil and the imperative for conservation of our natural resources was recognized by the Congress more than fifty years ago by creating the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF).  LWCF is based on a simple idea: use revenues from the depletion of one natural resource - offshore oil and gas — to support the conservation of another precious resource: our land and water.
Interior Secretary Ken Salazar has made a strong and continuing effort to persuade Congress to fund the LWCF at the level originally intended by Congress.  He needs the President's firm support in budget negotiations to assure adequate permanent funding.
The most important place to demonstrate Administration leadership for mitigating the impacts of offshore drilling is in Alaska. Offshore drilling in Arctic waters poses high risks that must be mitigated with strong conservation measures.
Bristol Bay, the passageway for the myriad salmon runs that travel through the rivers system of Alaska is the greatest and most productive fishery on the planet. President Obama should use the Antiquities Act to designate the federal waters of Bristol Bay, as a National Monument, permanently off limits to oil and gas. And as the administration opens the western Arctic slope lands to oil and gas leasing, there will be another opportunity to strike a balance between oil production and wildlife conservation. More leasing and drilling on the Arctic slope should await and be conditioned upon passage of legislation establishing protected shoreline areas and wetland regions in the far western Arctic frontier, including breeding and migration corridors for the fabled western Arctic caribou herds.
There is no issue as lasting or as worthy as the preservation of our natural and cultural heritage. Theodore Roosevelt, more than a hundred years ago, put it this way: "We have fallen heir to the most glorious heritage a people ever received, and each one must do his part to show that the nation is worthy of its good fortune.  Mr. President, America's great outdoors is under attack as never before. We need you to stand up to this assault as only the President can. You will have the lasting gratitude of the American people for generations to come.

Posted: 12 Jun 2011 08:33 PM PDT
Dave Foreman summarized brilliantly in his latest Around the Campfire why we need an Eastern Wildway and what basic steps need to be taken to achieve it.  As a Rewilding Fellow, and co-founder of the Wildlands Project with Dave and other such conservation luminaries as Reed Noss and Michael SoulĂ© twenty years ago, I'd like to offer some additional observations from a trek I'm taking north through our envisioned Eastern Wildway.  First a bit about the trek.
Having been working with such leading conservationists as the aforementioned and many others (through my past editorship of Wild Earth and oversight of the Foundation for Deep Ecology's Wilderness & Biodiversity granting program), I decided some time back that before I became as lame as my beloved Uncle Dave, I should cross the continent without supplemental octane, hiking, paddling, bicycling and otherwise propelling myself through and past the wild places that our wildlands community has been laboring for decades to protect, expand, and reconnect.  I'd thought maybe age 50 (2013) would be the time to start this long journey, but when my mother, Mary Byrd Davis (whom some of you know for her work with Wild Earth magazine and her Eastern Old-Growth Surveys), was diagnosed with cancer, I decided I better get going, or my folks might not be able to experience the wildways odyssey with me.  (Some of you also know that my mother died soon after instructing me to proceed with the journey and after my reemergence from a week in the Everglades—for which she uttered one of her final words: 'Wonderful'!)
From the start, three groups have been especially helpful in my trek planning: The Rewilding Institute has provided the bedrock conservation understanding and strategy that guide where I go and what I seek.  Dave Foreman and Howie Wolke's The Big Outside and Dave's Rewilding North America basically list and explain the ingredients for rewilding the East.  The Adirondack Council, where I was conservation director from 2005 to 2010, was immediately supportive and understanding when I told them, sadly, it was time for me to go, else I'd never make this needed journey.  They remain very much part of the trip, though I'm no longer on staff there.  The Wildlands Network has organized and conducted the whole communications effort associated with what we now call TrekEast.  Without the tireless support of Margo McKnight, Executive Director, and Keith Bowers, President, and their amazingly generous and skilled staff and board, my continental crossing would be a quiet walk in the woods.  With their help, it is becoming an outreach tool and communications initiative enabling us to talk with people we've never reached before.  (Please see http://wildlandsnetwork.org/trekeast pages, and send your thoughts and your own wildway experiences. Notwithstanding my technological primitiveness, TrekEast is now on Facebook and Twitter as well as the Wildlands Network website.)
In short, with the guidance of friends and colleagues from these three kindred groups and others, I am exploring on foot and canoe and bicycle the relatively intact parts of the Appalachian Mountains and Atlantic Seaboard that can be woven back together into an Eastern Wildway.  I write a blog for the Wildlands Network website and talk with fellow conservationists at numerous stops along the way and out in the field wherever possible.  Here are a few of my basic observations, from a mid-way stop in central Kentucky, followed by a brief account of a typical week in the life of TrekEast.
Suggestions from a Traverse of the Southeast
-Florida's conservation picture is far from finished.  At least ten million acres in the state remain undeveloped but unprotected.  Restoring the Panther to its rightful place across the East will require protecting Florida's ecological corridors, in large part through conservation easements on ranchlands, getting the big cat safely back into the Florida Panhandle and into Georgia's Okefenokee Swamp and Alabama's Conecuh National Forest, and ensuring at least wide riparian corridors from there into the mountains.  (Active reintroductions may be necessary because female Panthers will not usually cross major water bodies such as the Loxahatchie River, dredged into a barrier discouraging the big female cats from moving into northern Florida.)

- The Southeast Coastal Plain still has sizable areas of natural or semi-natural habitat.  Key to linking these areas, such as in South Carolina's ACE Basin and North Carolina's Albemarle Peninsula, with larger roadless areas in the Appalachian Mountains, will be the big rivers.  Not only are rivers natural corridors, in the coastal plain many still have broad riparian forest buffers (having been too flood-prone to farm or develop).  Accordingly, dams are nearly as big a problem in some developed areas as are roads.  Conversely, Longleaf Pine restoration can help reconnect coast, foothills, and mountains
.-The Piedmont, or foothills region, is perhaps the least well-protected part of the Southeast.  Connections between the coastal plain and the mountains must be protected soon or will be lost.  Longleaf Pine forest is the matrix that should connect these two broad physiographic types, even as the rivers bind them. Uwharrie National Forest and the Sandhills in North Carolina are critical links between coast and mountains.
-Recovery efforts for Panther, Red Wolf, Black Bear, River Otter, Bobwhite Quail, Red-cockaded Woodpecker, Gopher Tortoise, Eastern Indigo (snake), and Brook  Trout, to mention just a few charismatic species, can benefit greatly from the help of institutions that thus far conservation advocacy groups have not worked with much, such as zoos and aquaria, the Longleaf Alliance, Archbold and other biological research stations, hunting and angling clubs, and birding groups.  Already, zoos and biological research stations are doing much of the work for recovery of Red Wolves, Florida Scrub Jays, Red-cockaded Woodpeckers, and rare reptiles and amphibians.
-Dave's last Campfire outlined the key steps for rewilding the Appalachians.  His next issue will focus on specific incremental steps needed to gain footholds in strategic areas. Especially critical will be protecting all remaining roadless areas, closing unneeded back-country roads on the public lands, renewing funding for state and federal land conservation programs, removing unneeded dams, and building safe wildlife crossings on major roads.
A Week on the Blue Ridge
-The Southern Appalachians, largely in the Blue Ridge physiographic province, are biologically as rich as almost any area in America.  They rank high nationally or globally in species richness of salamanders, land snails, mussels, trees, and extent of remaining original forest (old growth) and wildlands. So I spent several wonderful weeks rambling through these old mountains, guided where possible by biologists.  One fairly typical week included meetings with leaders of the Southern Appalachian Forest Coalition, Wilderness Society, Open Space Institute, Wildacres, and Wild Law.  It included a day afield with the great old-growth sleuth Rob Messick, who took me to some of the biggest Tulip Poplars and oldest oaks I've ever seen, in the Black Mountains southeast of the Blue Ridge Parkway.  Seeing fresh bear scat and generations of bear claw marks on the huge trees reminded me why talented people like Rob have worked tirelessly for decades to save these ancient forest remnants.

-Sad and sobering, in contrast, were the walks in Joyce Kilmer Memorial Forest and Linville Gorge, where the relatively small size of the Wilderness Areas and the spread of the Hemlock Wooly Adelgid, an exotic species, has left most of the great Eastern and Carolina Hemlocks dead or dying.  Small wildlands, I was reminded, are highly susceptible to pests and pathogens brought in by roads and motor vehicles or even, ironically, by natural vectors such as wind or birds.  Walking among the huge hemlocks dynamited to the ground by the Forest Service at Joyce Kilmer was a painful reminder of what our beloved forests will face if we do not greatly enlarge and reconnect wildlands and keep out exotic species.

-Reviving my hope was a field trip with Brad & Shelly Stanback, on the Stanbacks' wild farm near Asheville.  There, Brad & Shelly are working with the American Chestnut Foundation to cross-breed blight resistance into chestnut trees, in hopes one day this food-rich tree can regain its place as a foundational species in the Southern and Central Appalachians.  Genetics is what scared me away from biology in college, so I won't try to repeat here Brad's scientific explanations of the cross-breeding and planting programs, or the generous attempts of Ron Sutherland, staff biologist for the Wildlands Network's Southeast program, to simplify the science enough for my small mind to absorb.  Suffice to say, chestnut restorationists have been successful enough already to have a chestnut tree that is 15/16 American Chestnut (the remainder Chinese Chestnut, from whence come genes conferring resistance to the chestnut blight) and bears fruit.  It may be decades before chestnuts are once again feeding bears and turkeys and deer and other mast-eaters far and wide, and only a miracle would have them feeding Passenger Pigeons again; but an amazing recovery story has begun on the Stanbacks' and other experimental restoration sites in the Southeast.

-All through the Carolinas, I was hearing stories of what a crucial role conservation benefactors like the Stanbacks play in supporting programs to protect and restore wildlands and wildlife. Other beneficiaries of wildlands philanthropy have included River Otters, which have been successfully reintroduced to many rivers in the Southeast; Black Bears, which are recolonizing much of their original range, too, with a boost from bear sanctuaries in the Smoky Mountains and elsewhere; Beavers, which are thriving on many privately protected stream stretches; and rare reptiles, which are being assisted by a great new privately funded conservation effort called Project Orianne.  So a final observation for now is that a few determined people really can save mountains!

In short, half way into TrekEast (about 3400 miles of an anticipated 6000), I find on the land threats unabated but also an amazing resilience – enough strength yet in the land to hope we can achieve an Eastern Wildway.  Sturdy wild strands remain, and so do good people with the passion to tie them back together — if we can but convince enough Americans to join us in restoring our natural heritage.
–John Davis, heading east to Daniel Boone National Forest's Clifty Wilderness
Follow John's adventure via his Wildlands Network blog: http://wildlandsnetwork.org/trekeast/blog 
Posted: 12 Jun 2011 08:31 PM PDT

Forest Service Examines Fire Retardant Policy

A new policy for using retardant to battle wildfires may consider the habitat and species in the area being treated. But saving human life would remain the top priority.By Kate Schwab
.
A watchdog group of Forest Service employees is taking federal officials to task for the way they dispense fire retardants from the air while fighting wildfires, but insists it has no desire to prohibit the use of firefighting chemicals.  Andy Stahl, executive director of Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics, says federal officials took "some baby steps in the right direction" with last week's release of a new draft environmental impact statement on fire retardants.The statement calls for better mapping of areas where endangered species might live, so firefighters can avoid dispensing retardant in those areas. Under the draft document's preferred alternative, language that presently allows retardant to be dropped in those locations to protect human life and property would be changed to saving "lives, However, he criticized the government's approach to the issue. The Forest Service, Stahl says, has never adequately explained the benefits of using retardants, as opposed to on-the-ground fire lines or other tools. Retardants are a western issue for the Forest Service, and are rarely used at all east of the Mississippi, he notes. That isn't because of a lack of fire, he maintains, but because the bulk of Forest Service land is in the West. Some environmental damage comes with clear-cut benefits that make it acceptable, he said—logging to construct homes, for example. Stahl said his group believes the number of incidents in which fire retardants actually get dropped too close to waterways or in critical habitat is underreported.  "The environmental harm may be worth suffering—if the stuff works," Stahl said. "But with retardant, the Forest Service has never explained what the benefit side is. We have nothing to balance the environmental costs against. We have dead fish, damaged wildlife habitat… for what?"  The active chemical in the retardant is ammonium phosphate. Basically, it's fertilizer, and it's come under fire for two reasons: When it dissolves in water, ammonia is released. That's toxic to fish and other organisms. And in regions such as the Southwest, native plants are adapted to harsh, poor soil conditions. Dump a load of fertilizer on them, and the soil composition changes. Invasive plants thrive in the newly enriched soil, while native species get choked out. Concerned that the Forest Service was not taking the effects of retardants seriously enough in its existing environmental analysis, Stahl's group sued. Last year, Missoula's federal district judge, Donald Molloy, ruled in their favor and ordered the new environmental impact statement. Public comments are being taken until June 27. The Forest Service has until Dec. 31 to not only complete the paperwork but also finish its consultations with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and fisheries.  The Forest Service is working with these agencies to map the habitat of plant and animal species vulnerable to retardants, in order to avoid dropping the chemicals there. Under a proposed rule change, the retardants would not be dropped in these locations unless it was deemed necessary to protect human life.   In addition, species not yet endangered but deemed "sensitive" by Forest Service standards are also being examined—a decision requested by the agency and not required by the lawsuit. Altogether, the agency is reviewing about 400 endangered and threatened species, as well as another 3,700 sensitive ones. Forest Service spokesman and veteran firefighter Glen Stein says his agency has used retardants effectively for 50 years. In a controlled laboratory setting, Stein says, it's easy to prove that they work. But fighting a wildland fire involves dozens of variables—humidity, wind, temperature—and retardant isn't always a good choice. It disperses too easily in windy conditions, for example.  And windy conditions are part of the problem. Present Forest Service policy says the primary goal of wildland firefighting is to protect human life and property. Stahl points out that most fires spread to homes via wind-blown embers. Therefore, he argues, there is no real evidence that retardants help.  He also questions the cost to taxpayers. Retardants cost more than $1 per gallon, he says.  "Only the federal Forest Service has a big enough budget to bother buying fire retardant," Stahl said. "State and local agencies haven't found that it's cost-effective." More than half of all retardant dumped in the U.S. is dispensed in California. That state does have a firefighting agency that also uses retardant.  "It's sort of like going into your local store, and buying a bottle of water, and using it to fight fires," Stahl said. But the entire point of using retardants is to avoid using water in the first place. In the 1950s, firefighters who tried to drop water from planes quickly learned that water dissipated and dried too quickly to be very useful in stopping forest fires, Stein said. Retardants were developed to fix that problem.  "What we've done over the years is develop something that keeps the liquid together," Stein said. "It also has a component, fertilizer salts, that helps reduce the fire intensity. It reduces the intensity of the fire and makes it easier to put the fire out."  Stein stressed that retardants simply offer another option for firefighters and are not used indiscriminately. Even the Forest Service can't afford to, he says. Only 18 air tankers for dropping retardant are available nationwide, and the competition for using them is fierce. The agency does want public input on the issue, Stein says. An online session for all interested parties will be held on June 16.
You are subscribed to email updates from Wolves, Wolf Facts, Cougars, Cougar Facts, Coyotes, Coyote Facts - Wolves, Cougars, Coyotes Forever
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.
Email delivery powered by Google
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610

Sunday, July 22, 2012

Fw: Alayna Alonzo commented on her post.

IMPORTANT--STOP THE KILLING OF OUR BEAVER'S.
THEY HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO LIVE OUT THEIR LIVE'S, JUST AS WE DO.
PLEASE PASS ALONG THIS PETITION AND SIGN IT.
THANK YOU.

  From: Facebook 
To: Randal Massaro <randal_massaro@yahoo.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 6:55 PM
Subject: Alayna Alonzo commented on her post.
facebook
Alayna Alonzo commented on her post.
Alayna wrote: "help please sign and pass around ..thank you ."
Reply to this email to comment on this post.
See Comment
This message was sent to randal_massaro@yahoo.com. If you don't want to receive these emails from Facebook in the future, please click: unsubscribe.
Facebook, Inc. Attention: Department 415 P.O Box 10005 Palo Alto CA 94303