Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Fw: [Navajos at Hweeldi] New link


LET'S STOP THE WAR ON OUR WILDLIFE, BEFORE IT'S TO LATE!
THE WAR ON THE WOLVE'S---STOP THE SLAUGHTER

Alessandra Tȟaté Witkó Frigerio 1:38am May 29

One Year, 400 Wolves
secure.defenders.org
Write to Interior Secretary Salazar urging him to immediately hold Idaho officials accountable for t...

View Post on Facebook · Edit Email Settings · Reply to this email to add a comment.

Fw: [Family of American Indian Nation] Elder's Meditation of the Day May 28


NATIVE AMERICAN PRAYER
Subject: [Family of American Indian Nation] Elder's Meditation of the Day May 28
To: "Family of American Indian Nation" <americanindianfalcon8@groups.facebook.com>
Date: Monday, May 28, 2012, 12:10 PM

Elder's Meditation of the Day May 28 "The land...
Marion Cooney 5:10am May 28
Elder's Meditation of the Day May 28

"The land is a sacred trust held in common for the benefit of the future of our nations."
--Haida Gwaii - Traditional Circle of Elders

The Creator made the Earth to support life so that life would continue to reproduce, everything would support one another, and future generations would have the same benefits of supply and beauty as the generations the proceeded them. This cycle will only continue to the degree that we make choices and decisions for the future generations. Today, we are too greedy and selfish. We are cheating our children, grandchildren, and the children unborn.

Creator, let me see the consequences of my decisions, and show me how to make healthy corrections.


View Post on Facebook · Edit Email Settings · Reply to this email to add a comment.

Fw: [WOLF LOVERS] New photo

--- On Wed, 5/30/12, Randal Massaro <randal_massaro@yahoo.com> wrote:


From: Randal Massaro <randal_massaro@yahoo.com>
Subject: Fw: [WOLF LOVERS] New photo
To: RANDALMASSARO@GMAIL.COM
Cc: "RANDAL MASSARO" <RANDAL_MASSARO@YAHOO.COM>
Date: Wednesday, May 30, 2012, 12:28 AM

From: Mary Hicks Subject: [WOLF LOVERS] New photo
To: "WOLF LOVERS" <333947633323849@groups.facebook.com>
Date: Wednesday, May 30, 2012, 12:06 AM

Fw: Coyotes,Wolves,Cougars..forever!

MORE NEW'S FROM OUR FRIEND'S.

--- On Wed, 5/30/12, Wolves, Wolf Facts, Cougars, Cougar Facts, Coyotes, Coyote Facts - Wolves, Cougars, Coyotes Forever <rick.meril@gmail.com> wrote:


From: Wolves, Wolf Facts, Cougars, Cougar Facts, Coyotes, Coyote Facts - Wolves, Cougars, Coyotes Forever <rick.meril@gmail.com>
Subject: Coyotes,Wolves,Cougars..forever!
To: RANDAL_MASSARO@YAHOO.COM
Date: Wednesday, May 30, 2012, 4:30 PM

http://coyotes-wolves-cougars.blogspot.com/)" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; COLOR: #888; FONT-SIZE: 22px; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; TEXT-DECORATION: none;">Coyotes,Wolves,Cougars..forever!


Chris Bolgiano is an expert on Eastern Pumas and has written some of the most authroritative books reviewing the historical record of 18th and 19th Century Puma sightings.............She celebrates the 1 year anniversary of the Black Hills, South Dakota Puma who journeyed 2000 miles into Connecticut before being run down by an auto.......In chris' words: "If one wild cougar can be recorded making this extraordinary journey, it’s possible that others of this secretive species may be moving without leaving any trace"..... "It’s already well-established that some western cougars move eastward"...... "In the last decade, Nebraska, Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma and Illinois have all confirmed cougars killed or photographed in places where they haven’t been seen in a century".............."Cougars were once integral to life here".... "Does that give them a right to return?".... "It is possible that cougars could thrive again in parts of the East, especially the Adirondacks and Appalachians, where large swaths of public lands were purchased in the 20th century to restore forests nearly destroyed by unregulated logging"........"Overwhelming evidence shows that top predators are critical to maintaining an ecosystem’s health"............. "The rapid spread of Lyme disease, carried by deer ticks; millions of dollars in annual vehicular collisions with deer; and widespread eating of forest regeneration, are all being demonstrably caused by overabundant deer browsing"-------Chris, we hope you get to publish your next book about Puma restoration in the East becoming a reality rather than just a hypothetical!

Posted: 29 May 2012 10:30 PM PDT

Eastern Cougartown: Return of a Native Predator

Commentary by Chris Bolgiano

As the first anniversary of the Connecticut Cougar’s death approaches this summer (June 11), I’m still stunned by the facts of his truly fantastic life. Identified by DNA as originating in South Dakota, the Connecticut Cougar left hair or droppings across the watery Great Lakes landscapes of Minnesota, Wisconsin and New York before leaving the ultimate evidence, his dead body, on a Connecticut highway. Clearly, that cat could swim.

Having researched cougars for decades — people called me “that cougar woman” long before the name took on its current lurid meaning — I knew that this almost magically elusive cat species appears in unexpected places at inopportune times. But a 140-pound fit, wild, 4-year-old male cougar from the Black Hills on a Connecticut highway nonetheless seems as outrageously improbable despite the fact that his historic journey from the West to the East was scientifically documented.

Native throughout North and South America when Europeans arrived, cougars —also known as mountain lions, puma and panthers— continue in patchy populations across the western United States, but are officially extirpated in the East.

The Connecticut Cougar traveled nearly 2,000 miles, three times farther than the record for the species. I feel an abiding sorrow that he did not survive such a valiant search for sex, which is what he was likely doing. Despite their independent habits, cougars are as addicted to social networks as humans, sending excretory rather than electronic signals.

There couldn’t be much scent remaining in the East. By the early 1900s, cougars were persecuted down to rare individuals in remote hollows of the Adirondack and Appalachian mountains. Wildlife agencies have traditionally ascribed the dozens of cougars confirmed across the East over the last half-century as escaped or released pets.

If one wild cougar can be recorded making this extraordinary journey, it’s possible that others of this secretive species may be moving without leaving any trace. It’s already well-established that some western cougars move eastward. In the last decade, Nebraska, Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma and Illinois have all confirmed cougars killed or photographed in places where they haven’t been seen in a century. Inexpensive trail cameras have opened up wildlife science to citizen participation, valuable despite the perennial photo hoaxes of western cougars portrayed as eastern that go around the Internet.

Pumas would help "dent" the out-of-control white tail deer #'s

Even if other males make it here, though, females usually stay close to home. Some biologists doubt that cougars can build viable populations in the East without human help, such as reintroducing a few females where a male is known to roam.

Cougars were once integral to life here. Does that give them a right to return? It is possible that cougars could thrive again in parts of the East, especially the Adirondacks and Appalachians, where large swaths of public lands were purchased in the 20th century to restore forests nearly destroyed by unregulated logging, and there would be some benefits.

Overwhelming evidence shows that top predators are critical to maintaining an ecosystem’s health. The rapid spread of Lyme disease, carried by deer ticks; millions of dollars in annual vehicular collisions with deer; and widespread eating of forest regeneration, are all being demonstrably caused by overabundant deer browsing.

Cougars, which prefer deer for dinner, aren’t the full answer to this problem, but studies out West show that they help keep deer populations at stable levels, allowing both cougar and human hunting while sustaining healthy deer numbers.

But cougars also challenge human tolerance in a primal way. Hunting alone, cougars rush from behind cover, and can easily eat people and livestock. They attack people so rarely that the risks are far less than getting hit by lightning, although some people might find lightning more appealing.

Experience on Western ranches shows that most depredations can be avoided through the management of livestock and people. Millions of people in Western states live successfully with cougars, albeit because they have to as subdivisions invade cougar habitat.

Returning cougars offer an opportunity to rethink our relationship with nature in the ravaged forests of the Eastern United States.

Since the Connecticut Cougar made headlines, cougar sightings — the bane of wildlife biologists because there’s rarely any physical evidence involved — have increased dramatically. Just last week I got an excited call from a neighbor, here in the Appalachian Mountains of western Virginia, that yielded photos of dog tracks. Other reports proved to be a dead deer, a dead house cat and a video of a dog. People see what they want to, either out of fear or hope.

Chris Bolgiano is the author or editor of five books. This commentary is distributed by Bay Journal News Service.

You are subscribed to email updates from Wolves, Wolf Facts, Cougars, Cougar Facts, Coyotes, Coyote Facts - Wolves, Cougars, Coyotes Forever
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.
Email delivery powered by Google
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610

Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Fw: Coyotes,Wolves,Cougars..forever!

FROM OUR FRIEND'S AND ALLIE'S.

--- On Tue, 5/29/12, Wolves, Wolf Facts, Cougars, Cougar Facts, Coyotes, Coyote Facts - Wolves, Com:


From: Wolves, Wolf Facts, Cougars, Cougar Facts, Coyotes, Coyote Facts - Wolves, Cougars, Coyotes Forever <rick.meril@gmail.com>
Subject: Coyotes,Wolves,Cougars..forever!
To: RANDAL_MASSARO@YAHOO.COM
Date: Tuesday, May 29, 2012, 4:46 PM

http://coyotes-wolves-cougars.blogspot.com/)" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; COLOR: #888; FONT-SIZE: 22px; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; TEXT-DECORATION: none;">Coyotes,Wolves,Cougars..forever!


The Red Fox population in Labrador, Canada has entered the rabies cycle again after seeing little of the dreaded disease since 2005..........While Coyotes can contract rabies, there never seems to be a widespread outbreaks in their population..........However, Foxes have always been a vector of the disease and area Vets say that the Arctic Fox seems to serve as a permanent reservoir for rabies and that this species of Fox tends to.infect the "Reds" in Labrador..........Fox numbers ebb and flow with the outbreaks which seems to be one of natures ways of controlling this canids numbers

Posted: 28 May 2012 10:35 PM PDT

Foxes fuel Labrador rabies fears

By ALY THOMSON The Canadian Press; thechronicle.ca

A red fox sits in the grass. A outbreak of rabies in Newfoundland and Labrador worries the province's chief veterinarian. (AP)
A red fox sits in the grass. A outbreak of rabies in Newfoundland and Labrador worries the province's chief veterinarian.           

Newfoundland and Labrador's chief veterinary officer says a "significant" and widespread outbreak of rabies in Labrador is cause for concern.The province's Natural Resources Department has confirmed 16 cases of rabies in red foxes since January, 12 in Labrador City and Wabush.
Prior to this year, the last confirmed case was in 2005.

But chief veterinary officer Dr. Hugh Whitney said it's not only the number of cases that is worrisome, but also how widespread the disease is across Labrador."This one is quite a significant (outbreak)," said Whitney from his office in St. John's. "There are few places left on our map that it hasn't touched.""We have 15 cases, which is not a large number, but 15 cases over a very large geographic area suggests that it could really be 100 cases, could be 500 cases in reality."
Whitney said that 10 people have been vaccinated for exposure to rabies this year for incidents ranging from bites to handling the carcasses.

"Rabies is a significant concern because...we have the added problem that it affects all mammals. It can get into dog populations. Dogs can affect people or foxes can attack people," said Whitney, adding that the disease is preventable in humans, but needs to be identified.Whitney, the province's chief veterinary officer for more than 26 years, said the disease's seven-year absence is not unusual, as outbreaks run in cycles. But officials have little foresight, as a number of factors make it difficult to predict when the next outbreak will happen.

The Arctic serves as a permanent reservoir for Canadian fox rabies, said Whitney. He said Arctic foxes bring the disease down into northern Quebec and Labrador and infect the region's red foxes. If the red fox population is high and food is scarce, the diseased animals will start moving away from the woods and into communities, he said.

"So, for the years between 2005 and 2012... there could have very well have been an outbreak of rabies, but there wasn't enough foxes around for the foxes to actually come to the communities and exhibit the outbreak," said Whitney.Whitney said public education is paramount when dealing with an outbreak, as little can be done to prevent or eradicate it."We cannot influence the wildlife populations, nor their movement," said Whitney.

One of the ways of potentially limiting the number of wolves killed in Minnesota this coming Fall is to buy one of the 6000 hunting tags being offered up by the Dept of Ntl Resources.............If enough folks who did not want Wolves killed did this, then perhaps the 400 targeted Wolves to be removed from the population could be spared..................One hunter is going to do exactly that because as he saids below: " As a deer hunter who knows the value that wolves provide in culling deer herds of their unhealthy numbers, among other benefits for the soul, I plan to do just that"

Posted: 28 May 2012 10:32 PM PDT

Buy a wolf license to save a wolf

Who's afraid of the Big Bad Wolf? Evidently, the Minnesota Deer Hunters Association and a majority of the Minnesota Legislature—the parties responsible for ramming a wolf hunting season through the Capitol five years ahead of schedule.

When the federal government removed gray wolves from the endangered and threatened species lists in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan in January, the wolf haters ramped up their bloodthirsty lobbying efforts for a 2012 season to start shooting them legally for the first time in Minnesota since the 1970s.

The DNR states that "Minnesotans clearly value wolves. Public opinion surveys and attitudes demonstrated during development of the state's wolf management plan show people view the animal as ecologically important, scientifically fascinating, aesthetically attractive, recreationally appealing and significant for future generations. Only a small minority fear and dislike wolves or believe Minnesota would be a more desirable place without this apex predator."

Yet it was that "small minority" that drove the legislature to start killing wolves this year rather than wait five years to see how the population stabilized after federal delisting, as the original plan called for. That same "small minority" has been shooting wolves illegally for decades and is now just looking for cover for their cowardly deeds. It's one of the few federal crimes that I hear people--including one state lawmaker--openly admit to committing.

'Pent-up enthusiasm'

DNR Fish & Wildlife Director Ed Boggess told a legislative panel earlier this year: "There's been a pent-up enthusiasm, a pent-up demand to hunt wolves." It's not likely that "enthusiasm" is driven by a sudden popularity of wolf fur among hunters. And it's certainly not for their meat.
The wolf season has little to do with protecting farmers from wolf depredation of livestock, either; they already are compensated for those losses. It has equally little to do with population management of wolves. According to the DNR, Minnesota's wolf population—the largest in the lower 48 states—has remained "relatively stable" at around 3,000 for the past decade without a hunting season.

A total of 6,000 wolf licenses will be made available via lottery (5,400 hunting and 600 trapping/snaring); 95 percent will be sold to residents and 5 percent to nonresidents. A quota of 400 wolves will be allowed to be killed during the season.
So the legal killing of wolves has been signed, sealed and delivered by the State of Minnesota, and the season is set. Nothing more that can be done about it, right?
Well, perhaps.

$34 to save a wolf?

If you're willing to invest $34, you can buy a chance on saving one wolf's life. Simply enter the lottery for one of the 6,000 licenses—a $30 wolf license must be purchased to enter the lottery, which costs another $4—and if you win the right to kill a wolf, don't exercise it.
There's nothing that requires you to use a wolf license just because you buy one. Since there's a cap on the number of licenses sold, every license that is won in the lottery but not used reduces the chances that the wolf kill quota set by the DNR will be reached.

Ordinarily, this might be seen as unwise meddling in a scientifically-based hunting season. But there is nothing scientific about this wolf hunting season. It's a purely political response to satisfy the bloodlust of a vocal minority of wolf haters. A season on wolves is not necessary to maintain a desirable wolf population. In fact, the DNR hasn't even determined what Minnesota's maximum wolf population should be, only that it shouldn't fall below a winter population of 1,600.
So if you think a season on wolves is one of the most idiotic things to come down the pike since a mourning dove season, step right up and invest $34 on a chance to buy a wolf a reprieve from the executioner. It may not stop the jackpine savages from shooting wolves altogether, but at least you'll get the satisfaction of making them work a little harder to "get their wolf."

As a deer hunter who knows the value that wolves provide in culling deer herds of their unhealthy numbers, among other benefits for the soul, I plan to do just that.

You are subscribed to email updates from Wolves, Wolf Facts, Cougars, Cougar Facts, Coyotes, Coyote Facts - Wolves, Cougars, Coyotes Forever
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.
Email delivery powered by Google
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610

Fw: [WOLF LOVERS] New photo

MY FACEBOOK FRIEND MARY HICK'S SENT ME THIS TO BRING ATTENTION TO THE PLIGHT OF THE WOLVE'S----  THOUSAND'S, IF NOT MILLION'S OF DOLLAR'S WAS SPENT TO BRING THE WOLVE'S BACK,AND  NOW A CRUEL AND RUTHLESS WAR IS BEING WAGED AGAINST THEM, TO EXTERMINATE THEM, WIPE THEM OUT FOR GOOD, ALONG WITH COYOTE'S, MTN LION'S, BOBCAT'S, BEAR'S , WILD HORSE'S, BURRO'S, AND OTHER WILDLIFE.
From: Mary Hicks
Subject: [WOLF LOVERS] New photo
To: "WOLF LOVERS" <333947633323849@groups.facebook.com>
Date: Wednesday, May 30, 2012, 12:06 AM

Fw: burro pix

SAVE THE WILD BURRO'S---STOP THE ROUND UP['S
HERE ARE SOME RECENT PICTURE'S TAKEN FROM OUR FRIEND'S AND ALLIE'S THAT ARE OUT IN THE FIELD SAVING THE WILD HORSE'S AND BURRO'S
GREAT JOB YOU GUY'S
IF YOU LEAVE IT UP TO THE DEPT OF INTERIOR, THE CATTLE RANCHER'S ANDS THE BLM--YOU WONT SEE THESE ANIMAL'S AROUND MUCH LONGER .
Subject: Fw: burro pix



----- Original Message -----
From: 
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 6:38 AM
Subject: burro pix

Taking a little snooze on the centerline

They’ve been hanging out in the desert during the day in the same place we photographed them the other day, here they are on the move just starting to cross the street shortly before sunset, maybe starting to head down to the river for a drink. But we spooked them with the truck and everyone ran back into the desert but didn’t go too far.

There were 22 Jacks altogether, 4 were too far off to the right to fit in the photo.  Hopefully they’ll stay off the highway or they’ll end up getting bait trapped like last summer.

Parker_dragonflies20066crre

The Jennies seem to stay a bit to the north and were the ones getting hit by cars on the highway, then bait trapped by the BLM.

These guys would be much better off if they went back into the Refuge where they aren’t being seen all the time and stay there.

Monday, May 28, 2012

Fw: Coyotes,Wolves,Cougars..forever!

HERE'S THE LATEST FACT'S AND FIGURE'S FROM OUR FRIEND'S AT : WOLVES,COUGARS,COYOTES FOREVER.

--- On Mon, 5/28/12, Wolves, Wolf Facts, Cougars, Cougar Facts, Coyotes, Coyote Facts - Wolves, Cougars, Coyotes Forever <rick.meril@gmail.com> wrote:


From: Wolves, Wolf Facts, Cougars, Cougar Facts, Coyotes, Coyote Facts - Wolves, Cougars, Coyotes Forever <rick.meril@gmail.com>
Subject: Coyotes,Wolves,Cougars..forever!
To: RANDAL_MASSARO@YAHOO.COM
Date: Monday, May 28, 2012, 4:06 PM

Coyotes,Wolves,Cougars..forever!


Habitat, Habitat, Habitat----- Whether it be Canada, the USA or any other Country across the globe,,,,,, if we do not provide wildlife with large protected core reserves combined with secure corridor links between the reserves, then expect extirpation and extinction events to multiply in frequency...........35 species have been identified by the COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF ENDANGERED WILDLIFE IN CANADA as being at severe risk of depletion and extinction

Posted: 27 May 2012 10:13 PM PDT

Habitat matters for Canadian wildlife species

By Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada

OTTAWA, - Thirty-five Canadian wildlife species, from whales to mosses, were assessed as at risk at the recent COSEWIC (Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada) meeting in Kananaskis, Alberta, April 29-May 4, 2012. Once again, habitat loss emerged as the most common threat to Canadian wildlife, underscoring that all species, not just our own, need a healthy home in order to thrive.

Fishes face increasing pressure from declining habitat
Habitat loss and degradation are the most common cause of species decline worldwide and Canada's freshwater fishes are no exception. It's not just freshwater fishes that rely on streams and rivers; a very large fraction of Canadian biodiversity including birds, insects, plants and amphibians rely on healthy aquatic habitats. Seven freshwater fishes were assessed by COSEWIC as being at risk in Canada. These include the Northern Madtom, Blackstripe Topminnow, Pugnose Minnow and Silver Chub, all of which are found in southwestern Ontario. In this region, the Sydenham River alone is home to a number of additional species previously assessed as at risk by COSEWIC. These include three additional freshwater fishes, five mussels and the Spiny Softshell. In every case, loss or degradation of habitat was key to these designations. While some aspects of water quality in the Sydenham River have improved as a result of environmental regulation that limits industrial pollution of the river, the habitat of these non-commercial fishes and other species remains threatened by agricultural inputs and urbanization. The unique biodiversity of this region will only improve with careful monitoring and rigorous protection of fish habitat.

Canada's prairie region

   

Canadian icon faces an uncertain future
Few species can match the Grizzly Bear as an emblem of Canadian wilderness. While grizzlies are at least twice as strong as the average human, in reality they are likely to pay with their lives when our two species interact. Over the past century, human-caused mortality and declining habitat have reduced the Grizzly Bear's global range by more than 50%. Today, Canada has a major responsibility for safeguarding remaining grizzly populations. In the southern part of their range, where they are in regular contact with humans, many populations are declining. In the north, the impacts of ongoing and escalating extraction of natural resources are a cause for concern. Considering these threats, the Grizzly Bear was assessed as Special Concern by COSEWIC. This assessment concludes a two-year process incorporating science and Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge.

Enigmatic American Eel swims against the current
American Eels are remarkable fish. They spend most of their lives in freshwater then return to the sea, migrating from streams and rivers that span Greenland to South America to spawn in the mid-Atlantic Sargasso Sea. Young eels journey over 7000 km to rivers and streams where they live for up to 20 years before starting their downstream migration to the sea. This complex lifestyle exposes the eels to a variety of threats over large areas and timespans, which resulted in a Threatened designation. American Eels that migrate to Lake Ontario and the upper St. Lawrence River have declined drastically over the past 40 years. Despite improvements to hydroelectric dams that reduce risks to young eels migrating upstream, older eels still suffer high mortality during the downstream migration. In Atlantic Canada, existing fisheries place additional pressure on the American Eel.

Canada's other beaver can't handle the heat
While nearly all Canadians can recognize the North American Beaver, its distant relative, the Mountain Beaver is probably unknown to most. Mountain Beavers occur in Canada only in the Coast Mountains and south of the Fraser River in British Columbia. Mountain Beaver, the last living representative of an ancient lineage of rodents, was assessed as Special Concern. These beavers live in underground dens built in deep, loose soil along the edges of cool, forested streams. These sites can be degraded by forestry practices that compact the soil. Mountain Beavers are highly intolerant of heat and drought, and are especially sensitive to climate change. The Magnum Mantleslug, another wildlife species assessed as Special Concern, is similarly restricted to edges of cool streams and seepages and also faces threats from logging and climate change.

Canada's Boreal Forest("the lungs of the the north")

No avoiding human impacts
Northern and ocean-dwelling species should be buffered from human activity because more than two-thirds of all Canadians live within 200 km of our southern border; this is not true for many Canadian wildlife species. As with the grizzly, whose movements are increasingly disrupted by human encroachments into boreal and arctic regions, other northern and marine species live under the specter of human activities. For the Buff-breasted Sandpiper, a shorebird assessed as Special Concern, increased resource exploration on their Canadian Arctic nesting grounds poses a threat. The Marbled Murrelet, assessed as Threatened, is a charismatic diving bird that occurs in Canada along the BC coast where it is vulnerable to the loss of ancient forests where it nests. In the marine environment where murrelets feed, proposed increases in shipping traffic pose an additional threat. On the Atlantic coast, Leatherback Sea Turtles encounter fishing gear while feeding in Canadian waters. Entanglement with fishing lines and ropes attached to traps pose a key threat to this wildlife species, assessed as Endangered by COSEWIC. These species demonstrate how Canadian wildlife depends critically on habitat protection.

Next Meeting
COSEWIC's next scheduled wildlife species assessment meeting will be held in Ottawa, ON, in November 2012.

About COSEWIC
COSEWIC assesses the status of wild species, subspecies, varieties, or other important units of biological diversity, considered to be at risk in Canada. To do so, COSEWIC uses scientific, Aboriginal traditional and community knowledge provided by experts from governments, academia and other organizations. Summaries of assessments are currently available to the public on the COSEWIC website (www.cosewic.gc.ca) and will be submitted to the Federal Minister of the Environment in late summer 2012 for listing consideration under the Species at Risk Act (SARA). At that time, the full status reports and status appraisal summaries will be publicly available on the Species at Risk Public Registry (www.sararegistry.gc.ca).

There are now 650 wildlife species in various COSEWIC risk categories, including 287 Endangered, 161, Threatened, 179 Special Concern, and 23 Extirpated (i.e. no longer found in the wild in Canada). In addition to these wildlife species that are in COSEWIC risk categories, there are 15 wildlife species that are Extinct.

The Algonquin pond and eastern forest region of Canada

COSEWIC comprises members from each provincial and territorial government wildlife agency, four federal entities (Canadian Wildlife Service, Parks Canada Agency, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, and the Canadian Museum of Nature), three Non-government Science Members, and the Co-chairs of the Species Specialist and the Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge Subcommittees.

Definition of COSEWIC Terms and Status Categories:
Wildlife Species: A species, subspecies, variety, or geographically or genetically distinct population of animal, plant or other organism, other than a bacterium or virus, that is wild by nature and is either native to Canada or has extended its range into Canada without human intervention and has been present in Canada for at least 50 years.Extinct (X): A wildlife species that no longer exists.Extirpated (XT): A wildlife species that no longer exists in the wild in Canada, but exists elsewhere.Endangered (E): A wildlife species facing imminent extirpation or extinction.Threatened (T): A wildlife species that is likely to become Endangered if nothing is done to reverse the factors leading to its extirpation or extinction.Special Concern (SC): A wildlife species that may become Threatened or Endangered because of a combination of biological characteristics and identified threats.Not at Risk (NAR): A wildlife species that has been evaluated and found to be not at risk of extinction given the current circumstances.Data Deficient (DD): A category that applies when the available information is insufficient (a) to resolve a wildlife species' eligibility for assessment or (b) to permit an assessment of the wildlife species' risk of extinction.Species at Risk: A wildlife species that has been assessed as Extirpated, Endangered, Threatened or Special Concern.

While conflicts between Wolves and Pumas have always taken place where the two carnivores share habitat, Wolves usually dominate the larger Pumas because of their pack behavior(too many wolves versus the solitary puma)..............Pumas can top off at 200 pounds whereas the largest Wolves(without their bellies full of deer or elk) tip the scales at roughly 120 pounds.........Bitteroot, Montana biologists have recently come across dead wolves that apparently were done in by Pumas,,,,,,,probably lone Wolves seeking to steal a deer carcass from a Puma cache...............Will the increased hunting and trapping of Wolves in the Rocky Mtn States result in fractured wolf packs disbanding and survivors getting into more conflicts with resident Pumas?

Posted: 27 May 2012 10:21 PM PDT

Mountain lions kill collared wolves in Bitterroot


By PERRY BACKUS -missoulian.com


Mountain lions are taking a toll on Liz Bradley’s collared wolves in the Bitterroot this year.

Since January, two wolves radio-collared by the Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks wolf biologist have been killed by mountain lions.Last week, she found the latest dead wolf in the Warm Springs area, west of Sula.Like all the others she’s investigated since 2009, the wolf’s skull showed a severe puncture wound – a trademark of a lion kill.

In the Sula case, the lion ate a good portion of the wolf and then covered the carcass with debris.
“It’s hard to say what happened,” Bradley said. “There was no elk or deer carcass nearby that they may have been competing over.”There was, however, a deer carcass near the dead wolf she found in the Carlton Creek area west of Lolo in January. In that case, the wolf wasn’t consumed, but it did have the same canine tooth puncture through the skull.“That one was probably a conflict,” she said.

Last year, Bradley found two dead wolves that were probably killed by mountain lions. One was in Davis Creek, east of Lolo, and the other was south of Conner.In both cases, the carcasses were too far decomposed for positive identification on the cause of death. Both had clear puncture wounds through the top of their skulls.

In 2009, the first apparent lion-killed wolf was discovered in the West Fork area.
The number of wolf and lion encounters is unusual. “I haven’t heard of it happening anywhere else,” Bradley said. “It’s pretty interesting that the Bitterroot has had so many.”

Large predators sometimes do kill each other. There have been documented cases of that happening in many places around the West.“They compete for the same resource,” she said. “When there is overlap in areas where you have lots of prey, conflicts occur.”Four of the five wolves that Bradley knows were probably killed by mountain lions were fitted with a radio collar.“It’s too bad because we don’t have those now,” she said.

At the end of last year, Bradley had collars in seven packs in the Bitterroot. She’s now down to four.
“Ideally, we would have at least half of the packs collared in the Bitterroot,” she said.
Bradley estimates there are 14 packs in the Bitterroot, which includes the area around Lolo all the way down the east and west forks of the Bitterroot River.On average, pack sizes are smaller in the Bitterroot following last year’s hunting season. The largest pack now has nine wolves. Most have four to seven adults, with several including just a male and female.

Going into the pup season, Bradley estimated that there were between 60 and 70 adult wolves in the entire Bitterroot area.“That’s a little bit lower than what we had in 2011,” she said. “We had about 80 last year. We had some mortality.”Bradley won’t know this year’s numbers of pups until sometime later this summer.

She is asking the public for help in locating packs for collaring this spring, especially in the Darby and Sula areas, as well as the north Bitterroot Valley.Sightings can be reported by going to the Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks website under the wolf section. For recent wolf sightings of multiple animals, Bradley asks that people call her cell phone at (406) 865-0017
“I’m especially interesting in hearing about sightings in the Sula area right now,” she said.
If anyone stumbles across a dead wolf or mountain lion, she would be interested in hearing about that too.

By the looks of the article below, many folks in Alabama need some educating about how to coexist with Coyotes........While many Armed Forces bases around the Country have very forward thinking wildlife policies, Redstone Arsenal is on a wrongheaded course,,,,, trapping and killing them.............The City of Decatur is just plain misguided, thinking that there are "hundreds of them" within their city limits...........Town Fathers should create ordinances that do not allow cats and dogs to run free,,,,,,as well as guding their citizens on how to intimidate the coyotes rather than killing them(which just encourages younger and inexperienced Coyotes to reoccupy the vacancies created)............Kudos to the City of Huntsville where Officials have concluded that it is best to "pretty much leave them alone"

Posted: 27 May 2012 10:18 PM PDT

Coyote sightings increasing in North Alabama as municipalities grapple with shooting vs. trapping


coyote.jpg
A coyote on the Indian Creek Greenway.
.

They won't be using Acme bombs or anvils like in Road Runner cartoons, but Redstone Arsenal has announced it is "taking measures" to control the coyote population, measures that will kill at least some of them.

The move raises questions about the coyote population of North Alabama in general. When do coyotes become a problem? Do you kill them? Move them? Leave them alone? Let citizens trap them?

The arsenal Directorate of Emergency Services issued a press release earlier this month saying ongoing control measures haven't kept up with the animals' population growth.
Arsenal game warden Kelly Smith confirmed an upswing in sightings.
"It was not uncommon to see a coyote on occasion, but over the last four, five, six months they started becoming more regular in their appearances," he said.

Smith said the animals are getting "comfortable" around people and that's a concern.
Although he will trap skunks and raccoons and release them elsewhere on post, that's not practical with coyotes. He's killed eight in the last month or so. "It gives me no joy to do that," he added.
"With some of these coyotes my only option is to shoot them and remove them that way," Smith said. They are first caught in live traps (like cages)."I think it's very important to say that coyotes have their place in the ecosystem. I have no desire whatsoever to eliminate coyotes from Redstone Arsenal."We just have a few too many in some places that just can't hold that number of them."
In Decatur
Decatur, too, is dealing head-on with what city animal cruelty investigator Miles Naylor calls a "huge problem."
"At last count we were up to almost 60 pet deaths" in the last year, Naylor said last week. "I had one report today of two pets killed last night. It just keeps coming."
Asked if he thinks coyotes are solely to blame, Naylor replied:
"No, I know. I can look and hear the description and tell you that's exactly what that is. There's a certain way they kill and way they attack."In a typical year in the past, Decatur had seen about five or six pet deaths.

"Once you get 40 pets that are killed by a wild animal, how can you (tell) those 40 citizens that they have to hire somebody? They've only got the legal right to tell the person that they can use their small plot of land" to set traps, he said.
Since last July, 22 coyotes have been killed in the Decatur city limits -- a number that also includes road kill and attacks by dogs. The city catches them live in traps and puts them down, Naylor said. None have been rabid. He estimates there are hundreds around.

Several factors contribute to the coyote boom, he said, including less hunting and more animal rights activism. Yes, humans have encroached on their territory, "but we've also put less pressure on them.

"My personal opinion is that the state gives you the regulations, licenses and permits to deal with them. At what point do you deal with them? I feel like for the citizens that was the responsible move. We're a lot smaller than Huntsville. We had to address the issue."

Tracking coyotes is a "nightmare in the city," Naylor said, because they are observational learners. He makes them sound downright devious.

"A coyote will watch you pull up to your trap every day and know that you're going to be there at that time. That's how they get the pets. They watch your house every day, and once they know you leave at daylight, they don't come back until dark. Your little Chihuahua is out in the back, and it's their next meal.

"It's pretty amazing to me that you think you're safe from an animal that can jump 14 feet" by having a 4-foot chain-link fence, he said.

Not a protected species
Jud Easterwood, biologist at the state wildlife management office in Tanner, said "I can assure you coyotes are becoming a problem" and are clearly having an impact on wildlife.
The animals vary in color -- brown and even black -- and some people think they're seeing a red wolf when it's really a coyote, he said. Coyotes aren't a protected species and there's no hunting limit."They're open for the take," he said, during daylight hours in proper hunting areas.

Lee Kasmeier, a spokesman for North Alabama Wildlife Rehabilitators, said there are places where coyotes could be released in the wild -- such as Bankhead National Forest -- instead of killed."We have plenty of people who would go out of their way to help" relocate them, he said.

In Decatur, Naylor said some people have encouraged him to leave the critters alone."I've had some threats," he said. "I've had some people follow me. If we don't do something, you're going to have citizens shooting irresponsibly or dangerously through the city or setting traps or poison or different illegal means," he said."The last thing you want is a bunch of folks with 30-ought-sixes in your neighborhood shooting at coyotes at night."

In Huntsville
Urban coyotes are common in Huntsville, where they're pretty much left alone.Dr. Karen Hill Sheppard, director of Huntsville's Animal Services department, said there aren't necessarily more but they "have definitely become more visible.It's been pretty stable the 10 years I've been here," she said. "We know where people are most likely to see them -- anywhere along the mountains."

That includes "green corridors" near Monte Sano, Green and Huntsville mountains, plus the golf course on Bailey Cove Road, along Green Cove Road, in ditches along Carl T. Jones Drive and the Research Park area. Some communities like Monte Sano have become quite used to seeing coyotes, she said. In other areas, people are "shocked, like they saw a polar bear."

In consulting with wildlife control experts in other states about the growing number of coyotes, Sheppard learned that "what everyone is doing, by default, is nothing." Tracking them down "is not a wise use of taxpayer resources," she said. "We were never able to trap coyotes, and we're not going to shoot them. They don't go into traps. They are smart, smart, smart, smart.


"Most of our urban coyotes, what they do is stop and stare at you," she said. "I tell people to throw a rock at them, or yell at them. They think they're about to get taken out by a coyote, but they're not."
Sheppard heard about a woman walking a female dog (in heat) and two coyotes followed her. She was also carrying food. Andy Prewett, land manager for Huntsville Land Trust's roughly 6,000 acres, heard a similar report about a hiker with a dog on Monte Sano. The idea of menacing coyotes traveling in packs is "not realistic," he said.

Coyotes will run off with cats and dogs under 10 pounds, especially old or young ones, Sheppard said. If a dog is just injured, though, it's likely something else did it."The coyote would have eaten your dog," she said.Some residents have threatened to shoot coyotes. "We don't recommend that," Sheppard said flatly. It is illegal to fire a gun in the city limits, police spokesman Dr. Harry Hobbs confirmed, punishable by a $500 fine or up to a year in jail.If people are determined to get rid of coyotes, city animal control suggests they hire a private critter-catching company.

'Getting braver'
Chris Banks of Tennessee Valley Wildlife Control, which sells wildlife/pest removal services in North Alabama and Southern Tennessee, said he's probably killed "a couple hundred" coyotes in the last four or five years."They are eating a lot of cats," he said. "They are getting braver."
Near a horse ranch in Madison, he used foot traps and caught a male and a female the first night. "If you see their tracks, I can peg 'em."

He figures coyotes live 10 or 12 years with a good food source.
"They are going to keep multiplying and die of old age," he said.
"I caught one that looked like a wolf, and one that was as big as I was," he said. When he held the animal up by its legs, "its head was hanging past my feet." That was near Elk River.
Something else to think about: Banks figures he's killed 40 or 50 bobcats, too.

You are subscribed to email updates from Wolves, Wolf Facts, Cougars, Cougar Facts, Coyotes, Coyote Facts - Wolves, Cougars, Coyotes Forever
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.
Email delivery powered by Google
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610